Being a Christian is Counter-cultural (Romans 13)


In today’s chapter, Paul seems to question the way both the Jews and Gentiles run their lives. Many of these comments he makes, still hold relevance in our lives today. When you read the Bible, it is pretty amazing how many times life really hasn’t changed that much since Jesus’ day, and even before.

The first comment that he makes, that is totally counter-cultural is to have respect for authority (especially government authority). “Everyone must submit to governing authorities. For all authority comes from God, and those in positions of authority have been placed there by God.” (13:1 NLT). I wrote a little bit on following authority back in July. But it still holds true today. But it goes beyond just submitting. We have to show respect. We’re almost a year away from the last election, and people today still get pretty nasty over the winner or loser. It’s true that we can disagree with whatever policies or laws are made, but that doesn’t give us the right to name call or speak negatively. As a Christian, I believe that it is our duty to show right respect and submit to authority without any complaints. It is the world’s job to complain, not ours.

Paul goes on to call government “God’s servants”. They are charged with upholding the peace here on earth. God handles the eternal justice, but government is told to handle physical punishments. Paul said in the last chapter, “Don’t think you are better than you really are.” (12:3 NLT). If we were given the gifts and abilities to participate in government, that’s where we would be. Being in government is a special call, and not everyone can do it. But since we disagree does not meant that we are better than “God’s servants”, so don’t act like you are. Do the counter-cultural thing and accept governments role over you. Thank goodness we have the right to vote in the United States. That gives us the ability to voice our opinion. If you aren’t fond of the government, vote to change it. Otherwise, we must follow it’s lead (provided it doesn’t conflict with the way of God).

The second counter-cultural point that spoke to me in this chapter comes towards the end. In today’s world, along with the culture of Rome during the time of Paul’s writing, a party culture seems to reign supreme (especially for my age group). Nobody seems to think there is anything wrong with going to parties all weekend and getting drunk. Sexual promiscuity is a big issue as well. It isn’t a problem for people to fight with others over something simple or a misunderstanding. And there is a “keeping up with the Jones'” mentality among most people. Yet Paul writes, “Don’t participate in the darkness of wild parties and drunkenness, or in sexual promiscuity and immoral living, or in quarreling and jealousy.” (13:13 NLT). The world tells us that behaving this way is some how wrong, and the word “prude” gets thrown around. But what if Christians lived this way, and tried to help people see the error in their ways. The world would probably become a better place, and some of our problems might not be issues any more.

The things that God asks us to do, don’t always feel like big things. But when we think about what our friends, family, and the rest of the wold choose to do because “everyone else does it”, we begin to see how counter-cultural this way of life really is. So my friends, I encourage to know that you are not alone. We all have these issues to fight against, and God wants us to do it. This way we prove that we are His, and not the world’s. “So remove your dark deeds like dirty clothes, and put on the shining armor of right living.” (13:12 NLT). It will be hard, but God is there for you, to help you remain His and go against culture.

Previous Chapters

4 thoughts on “Being a Christian is Counter-cultural (Romans 13)”

  1. I find it odd that Paul would advocate obedience to government in light of the large number of examples in scripture counter to that idea that existed before he began his preaching. The prophet Amos, who condemned the treatment of the poor by the judicial system, comes to mind as an example of the exact opposite of submitting to government authority. Paul himself, in Corinthians, mentions that he has been held in prison several times. And yet “whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God.”

    In light of this, it doesn’t make sense to me for Paul to claim that all authority is derived from God. I wonder if he isn’t distinguishing authority from power. That is, power is having the ability to force compliance. But authority includes having the moral standing to use that power. Thinking like this avoids a sticky situation: in the case of war, the two opposing parties are both governments, implying that both are acting with divine authority on their side. And in that case, God has been of two minds throughout history.

    So I have to accept that Paul doesn’t mean all governments deserve our submission, merely those with moral standing. I also have to think that he is speaking more of what ought to be, rather than what is. Ideally, those in government would be guided by their faith, in which case the people would have no cause to flout them. But that wasn’t the situation during his life, and I don’t believe its the situation now.

    1. Thanks for you comment Jack. I’m not trying to imply a blind obedience to government. As I put in parenthesis, it is that so long as government does not conflict with God that we should obey it. But the thing I was really trying to get to is showing respect for government. Paul is saying in the first few verses of Romans 13 that we are subject to governing authorities because God placed them over us. However, we have nothing to fear unless we have done evil. It is when we do evil that government is supposed to do it’s job. Paul lived this way. He stayed a subject of the government and only disobeyed when it was opposite of God. When Paul was arrested in Acts 16, it was because he exorcised a woman and caused some men to lose their money maker. This, and speaking the gospel openly, we’re illegal action under Roman law. Clearly, Paul wasn’t acting against the government to simply rebel. He was working for God.

      I see no reason to read that Paul is making a distinction between authority and power. I believe that both have been given to government by God. It becomes their duty to use it for the good of the people, and according to God. However, man has been given free will which allows him to use this power (given to him by God) any way he sees fit. Unfortunately this does lead to wicked people in government and the ruling authorities becoming less than they we’re meant to.

      I can agree that not all government deserves our submission. But it does if it isn’t against God. Again, the main point I was trying to make is that we should show respect to our governing authorities, because all authority is given from God. That’s in Scripture. Yes, it is our duty as the people to fight against injustice, and corrupt government. But so long as it is not that way, than we must show respect. And most importantly, at least for us in the United States, if you don’t like something than it is your duty to vote for something different.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.